Academic discovery, re-ranked

Beyond the most relevant paper.

A transparent way to find the papers at the center of a field, and the connections waiting at its edges.

QUERY → LDA RANKING
BOUNDARY
TOP 5
LDA SEEDS
core resultco-cited papernew connectionfield boundaryclose topic
435Kphysics papers
3.7Mcitation links
65expert search queries
2 signalswords + citations
The problem

Topical relevance can narrow the view.

Rankings are good at showing what closely matches a query. Exploratory research also needs the useful surprise: a relevant paper that uses different language, sits at a disciplinary edge, or reveals an indirect connection.

What should your ranking reveal?

Balanceduser-controlled ranking
Topical breadthCore relevance
01 · coreStrong topic + citation signal
02 · coreCentral work in the field
03 · edgeRelated through a hidden link
04 · coreClose thematic neighbor
05 · edgeBoundary-spanning paper
What the study found

Depth and scope can work together.

01

Pennant strengthens relevance

Pennant retrieval produced the highest relevance and DCG values across the evaluated cut-offs.

02

LDA widens topical scope

LDA placed more topically diverse papers near the top, contributing breadth across subject categories.

03

Integration approaches the ideal

The combined ranking delivered the strongest NDCG pattern by preserving relevance while broadening conceptual coverage.

04

More robust to rewording

Performance fell by 10.9% for the integrated method, compared with 14.0% for pennant retrieval and 26.0% for LDA.

Relevance Theory

Relevance is more than similarity.

The method is grounded in the idea that relevance depends on the cognitive effect a paper creates and the effort required to recognize the connection.

Cognitive effectWhat new insight can this paper create?

Co-citation with the seed papers signals conceptual proximity and potential intellectual impact.

↔
Processing effortHow visible is the path to that connection?

Total citation visibility helps estimate the effort needed to recognize and interpret the relationship.

The strongest discovery signal comes from the balance, not from word overlap alone.

How it works

Two partial views become one richer map.

Words reveal topics.

Latent Dirichlet Allocation finds thematic structure in titles and abstracts. It contributes breadth and surfaces papers across related topics.

+

Citations reveal context.

Pennant retrieval uses co-citation and citation visibility signals. It reveals conceptually related work, including papers that may span disciplinary boundaries.

01Map the topic space

LDA ranks papers from the words in their titles and abstracts.

02Select seed papers

The top five LDA results become transparent starting points for citation exploration.

03Follow co-citations

Pennant retrieval finds papers repeatedly cited alongside each seed.

04Normalize and merge

Topic and citation scores are placed on a common scale and combined.

05Refine the ranking

A user-controlled weight adjusts the balance between depth and scope.

Why the boundary matters

The edge is not always noise. Sometimes, it is where discovery begins.

Core papers explain the established center of a topic. Some boundary-spanning papers do something different: they connect that center to another method, vocabulary, or discipline. They may have fewer obvious links, yet they can be especially valuable when the goal is to discover a relationship no familiar keyword would reveal.

Not less relevant. Relevant in a different way.
The best next paper may be the one you did not know how to search for.

Incremental refinement makes room for that paper.